AI

Using Claude Code for legacy modernization - 90 days does not finish it, but proves it is possible

Stop thinking 90 days will complete your COBOL to cloud migration. Use that time instead to prove legacy modernization can work, build organizational confidence, and create momentum for the challenging multi-year transformation ahead. That is how successful modernizations actually begin.

Stop thinking 90 days will complete your COBOL to cloud migration. Use that time instead to prove legacy modernization can work, build organizational confidence, and create momentum for the challenging multi-year transformation ahead. That is how successful modernizations actually begin.

Key takeaways

  • 90 days is not completion time - it is proof-of-concept time to demonstrate modernization works and build organizational confidence
  • AI-assisted tools reduce timelines significantly - modern approaches can cut modernization time by 40-50% compared to manual rewrites
  • Focus on proving value, not finishing work - use 90 days to modernize one critical component and show stakeholders the path forward
  • Most legacy migrations take 18-24 months minimum - realistic expectations prevent disillusionment and keep projects funded through completion
  • Need help implementing these strategies? [Let's discuss your specific challenges](/).

Ninety days will not modernize your legacy COBOL system.

I need to say that upfront because the tech industry keeps selling transformation in unrealistic timelines. But what 90 days can do is this: prove that modernization is possible, build organizational confidence, and create momentum for the real work ahead.

When you search for a “blog post using Claude Code” or similar AI tools for legacy modernization, you will find promises that sound too good to be true. They usually are.

The realistic timeline nobody talks about

Let me share what actually happens in successful modernizations. Utah’s Office of Recovery Services transformed their 25-year-old COBOL application to Java on public cloud in 18 months. Lincoln Financial Group transitioned legacy COBOL and assembler code to cloud in 2 years.

These are success stories. Not cautionary tales.

The difference between these wins and the 75% of IT projects that fail? They set realistic timelines and proved value incrementally. They did not promise complete transformation in 90 days. They used 90-day sprints to demonstrate progress and justify continued investment.

Organizations waste substantial resources annually on legacy inefficiencies. Your leadership team knows this. They are desperate for solutions. But desperation leads to buying impossible promises. Do not be that company.

What AI-assisted modernization actually delivers

This is where tools like Claude Code become valuable. AWS Transform modernized 40 million lines of COBOL for Toyota Motor North America 50% faster than traditional approaches. This is the kind of acceleration AI provides.

But notice what it accelerated: a structured modernization program, not a chaotic 90-day sprint.

When you write a blog post using Claude Code or similar tools for legacy work, focus on these AI capabilities:

Code analysis and documentation. AI can read your undocumented COBOL faster than any consultant. It maps dependencies, identifies business logic, and generates the documentation that probably never existed.

Pattern recognition across decades of code. Your COBOL system has patterns buried in millions of lines. AI finds them. This alone can save months of manual analysis.

Test generation from existing logic. Before changing anything, you need tests. AI can analyze what your code does and generate test cases that validate behavior. This safety net is crucial for mid-size companies that cannot afford migration failures.

The current technical debt across U.S. organizations is staggering, with the average legacy system consuming a significant portion of IT budgets. AI will not eliminate that debt in 90 days. It gives you the tools to tackle it systematically.

Why most projects fail and what to do instead

Gartner found that 75% of IT projects fail to meet objectives due to time and budget overruns. Large mainframe overhauls take 3-5 years with a 60% failure rate.

The pattern is always the same. Leadership approves a transformation initiative. Someone promises completion in an impossible timeline. The project misses early milestones. Budget overruns start. Political will erodes. The project gets quietly shelved, and everyone pretends it never happened.

The companies that succeed do something different: they plan for years, but prove value every 90 days. And they start with documentation, not transformation.

Most failed modernizations start by changing code before understanding it. That’s backwards.

When organizations spend 55% of their IT budgets maintaining outdated systems, leadership becomes receptive to alternatives. But they need proof the alternative works before committing fully. That means understanding your system completely before changing anything.

The Utah ORS project succeeded partially because they used automated refactoring tools that understood the complete system before changing anything. They mapped dependencies first, transformed code second.

When you are creating a blog post using Claude or building a business case, emphasize this: understanding before changing is not wasted time. It is the difference between successful transformation and expensive failure.

Modern AI tools can analyze codebases thousands of times faster than manual review. That does not mean you skip the analysis. It means you do thorough analysis in weeks instead of years.

Your 90-day proof-of-concept roadmap

So what do you actually do in 90 days? You prove the approach works with one component.

Pick your most painful COBOL module. The one where every change takes weeks because nobody understands it anymore. That’s your target.

Days 1-30: Analysis and planning. Use AI to map the component completely. Every dependency, every business rule, every integration point. Generate comprehensive documentation. Build the test suite that validates current behavior.

Your developers spend 33% of their time dealing with technical debt. Use AI to reclaim that time for actual modernization work.

Days 31-60: Modernize the component. This is where AI-assisted code transformation happens. Not automatic conversion - that rarely works. Assisted transformation where AI suggests modern equivalents and developers validate business logic.

Days 61-90: Integration and validation. Get your modernized component working in production alongside the legacy system. Prove it handles real load. Show stakeholders the new code is faster, cheaper to maintain, and will not break anything.

At the end of 90 days, you have not finished. But you have proved it works. That proof is worth more than any PowerPoint deck promising complete transformation.

Your practical framework for executing this:

Select your pilot component carefully. Choose something painful but not mission-critical. Painful enough that success matters, but not so critical that failure endangers the business.

Assemble a small, focused team. Three to five people who understand the legacy system and are eager to learn modern approaches. Avoid trying to modernize with a cast of dozens. Small teams move faster.

Use AI for acceleration, not automation. Tools like Claude Code analyze code, suggest transformations, generate tests. But developers make final decisions. This hybrid approach is 40-50% faster than manual work while maintaining quality.

Build tests before changing anything. Use AI to generate test cases from existing behavior. These tests become your safety net. When they pass after modernization, you know business logic survived.

Deploy incrementally to production. Do not wait 90 days to deploy. Get your modernized component into production by day 60. Spend the final 30 days proving it works under real load.

Measure and communicate progress weekly. Leadership needs visibility. Show them metrics: lines of code analyzed, tests generated, components modernized, performance improvements. Make the progress visible and concrete.

At day 90, you should have one fully modernized, production-deployed component. That is your proof point. This is what funds the next phase.

What comes after the first 90 days

Successful modernization is a series of 90-day sprints, not one massive project.

After proving the approach works, you can tackle larger components with organizational confidence. But realistic expectations remain critical. Financial services organizations spend 70-75% of IT budgets on legacy COBOL platforms. Unwinding that takes years, not quarters.

Budget for 18-24 months of sustained effort. Plan 90-day milestones that each deliver production value. Build the political capital to see it through.

The organizations that successfully modernize legacy systems share one characteristic: they are honest about timelines while aggressive about demonstrating value.

Writing this blog post using realistic expectations about Claude Code and AI tools serves your organization better than overpromising. Your stakeholders will thank you when the project succeeds instead of becoming another abandoned initiative.

Ninety days proves modernization works. The next 12-18 months complete it. This is the honest timeline for moving decades-old COBOL systems to cloud-native architectures.

Start your 90-day proof-of-concept focused on one painful component. Use AI to accelerate analysis and transformation. Deploy to production. Prove it works. Then sell leadership on the multi-year program to finish the job properly.

This is how legacy modernization actually succeeds.

About the Author

Amit Kothari is an experienced consultant, advisor, and educator specializing in AI and operations. With 25+ years of experience and as the founder of Tallyfy (raised $3.6m), he helps mid-size companies identify, plan, and implement practical AI solutions that actually work. Originally British and now based in St. Louis, MO, Amit combines deep technical expertise with real-world business understanding.

Disclaimer: The content in this article represents personal opinions based on extensive research and practical experience. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy through data analysis and source verification, this should not be considered professional advice. Always consult with qualified professionals for decisions specific to your situation.