AI

The complete AI implementation checklist

When 85% of AI projects fail, the problem is not the technology. Most companies evaluate features when they should be evaluating support, infrastructure readiness, and team preparation.

When 85% of AI projects fail, the problem is not the technology. Most companies evaluate features when they should be evaluating support, infrastructure readiness, and team preparation.

Key takeaways

  • Vendor support matters more than features - Companies that succeed with AI prioritize responsive support and partnership quality over flashy capabilities
  • Most failures happen before deployment - Data quality issues, lack of team training, and unclear objectives cause more failures than technical problems
  • Implementation is 10% technology, 90% change management - Technical setup takes weeks, but getting teams to actually use AI effectively takes months
  • Start with business value, not AI capabilities - The most successful implementations solve specific problems rather than exploring what AI can do
  • Need help implementing these strategies? Let's discuss your specific challenges.

Gartner reports that 85% of AI projects fail to deliver expected business value. Not “fall short” - fail entirely.

Here’s what no one tells you: the problem is not the AI. The problem is that most companies build an ai vendor evaluation checklist focused on features when they should be evaluating support quality, data infrastructure, and whether their teams are ready for the change.

I’ve watched mid-size companies burn through months and significant budgets chasing the wrong checklist items. They compare model accuracy percentages and API response times while ignoring whether the vendor will answer the phone when things break at 3am.

Why most AI projects never make it to production

The numbers get worse when you dig in. MIT research found that only 5% of AI pilots achieve rapid revenue acceleration. The rest stall out.

The failure patterns are predictable. Recent studies identify data quality and readiness as the top barrier at 43%, followed by lack of technical maturity at 43% and shortage of skills at 35%.

But here’s the thing - these are not technology problems. These are preparation problems.

A company will spend weeks evaluating which AI vendor has the best feature set, then discover their data is scattered across 15 different systems in incompatible formats. By the time they realize this, they’ve already signed the contract.

The ai vendor evaluation checklist should start with your infrastructure and team readiness, not the vendor’s capabilities. Vendors love selling features. What you actually need is someone who’ll help you prepare your organization.

What to evaluate before you write a check

When you’re building your ai vendor evaluation checklist, here’s what actually matters for mid-size companies.

Data infrastructure first. Before looking at any vendor, audit your data. Is it accessible? Is it clean? Can you actually feed it to an AI system without months of preparation work? IBM reports that data fragmentation is killing AI projects before they start.

Not having clean data is like buying a sports car when you don’t have a driver’s license. The car works fine, but you can’t use it.

Support quality over feature lists. This is where most ai vendor evaluation checklists go wrong. Everyone compares features. Almost no one asks: “What happens when this breaks? How fast do you respond? Can you help us implement, or just sell us software?”

Research shows that companies successfully implementing AI treat vendors as partners, not suppliers. They look for dedicated customer success teams and detailed onboarding support.

Ask vendors about their service level agreements for response times. If they’re vague or dismissive, that’s your answer. When 88% of customers are more likely to renew when SLA requirements are met, support quality directly predicts success.

Team capability assessment. Your ai vendor evaluation checklist needs a brutally honest section about your team. Do they understand how AI works? Not at a PhD level - at a “can they actually use this tool effectively” level?

Studies found that employees who receive customized onboarding become productive 50% faster and are 3X more engaged. But only 42% of HR professionals using AI have figured out how to train their teams properly.

If your team is not ready, the fanciest AI in the world sits unused. I’ve seen it happen repeatedly - companies buy enterprise AI tools, then watch usage drop to zero within three months because no one knows what to do with them.

Integration complexity. This one kills more projects than companies admit. Research indicates that AI vendors should provide API access and easy integration with existing systems.

Translation: if connecting the AI to your current software requires six months of custom development, you’ve picked the wrong vendor. Or the wrong time to implement.

Mid-size companies can’t afford integration nightmares. You need AI that works with what you already have, not AI that requires rebuilding your entire tech stack.

Setting up technical infrastructure and team readiness

Once you’ve evaluated vendors properly, the real work starts. Most companies think buying the AI is the hard part. Actually using it is harder.

Phased rollout beats big bang every time. Analysis shows that taking a phased approach yields the best results. Start with one use case, get it working, learn from it, then expand.

Companies that try to deploy AI across everything at once create chaos. Teams don’t know what to focus on, support gets overwhelmed, and projects stall.

Pick one problem. Fix it with AI. Prove it works. Then do the next one.

Partner with IT early, not late. This sounds obvious, but 40% of companies delay AI implementation because they lack in-house AI expertise. By the time they bring IT into the conversation, they’ve made architectural decisions that IT now has to fix.

Your IT team knows your infrastructure. They know where the integration nightmares hide. Involve them from the start, not when things break.

Build training into the timeline. Here’s a hard truth: technical setup takes weeks. Getting humans to change how they work takes months.

Organizations report that structured 30-60-90 day plans help new hires reach full performance 50% faster. The same principle applies to AI implementation. You need a training plan that extends well beyond launch day.

Most ai vendor evaluation checklists skip training entirely. They assume if you buy the software, people will figure it out. They won’t. Not without help.

Launching AI in a way that humans can actually use

Launch day is when your ai vendor evaluation checklist either validates itself or exposes what you missed.

Balance automation with human oversight. Research found that 52% of successful AI implementations pair automation with personal follow-ups. Pure automation feels impersonal and breaks trust. Humans checking the AI’s work builds confidence.

This is especially true for mid-size companies where relationships matter. Your team needs to trust the AI, and trust takes time.

Create feedback loops immediately. Launch is just the beginning. Companies that succeed schedule quarterly reviews to evaluate performance and adjust based on patterns and insights.

Without feedback mechanisms, you won’t know what’s working. Your team will struggle in silence, usage will drop, and you’ll wonder why the AI failed.

Set up regular check-ins. Ask what’s confusing. Fix it. Ask what’s useful. Do more of that.

Expect the learning curve. IBM’s Watson Assistant reduced task time by 75%, but that took months of optimization. The first version was probably clunky.

Your AI implementation will be messy at first. That’s normal. Companies that accept the learning curve and iterate succeed. Companies that expect perfection on day one get frustrated and give up.

Measuring what actually predicts success

The final piece of your ai vendor evaluation checklist should be measurement. Not vanity metrics - actual business impact.

Track adoption before ROI. If no one uses the AI, it doesn’t matter how good it is. Monitor usage patterns, engagement levels, and which teams are actually logging in.

Low adoption signals problems: unclear value, inadequate training, or a solution looking for a problem. Fix adoption first, then worry about ROI.

Measure time to value, not just features deployed. How long before users see real benefit? Studies show that technology is important, but ethics, top management support, and technical competencies matter more for success.

If it takes six months before anyone sees value, your implementation strategy needs work.

Monitor support interactions. How often are teams reaching out for help? What questions keep coming up? This reveals training gaps and usability issues faster than any survey.

When the same questions appear repeatedly, that’s a signal. Either your training is missing something, or the AI tool is confusing.

The checklist most companies skip

Here’s what a complete ai vendor evaluation checklist should include - the parts most companies ignore:

Before vendor evaluation: data audit, team skill assessment, infrastructure review.

During vendor evaluation: support quality testing, integration complexity analysis, partnership approach verification, actual customer reference calls with companies your size.

After vendor selection: phased rollout plan, comprehensive training program, IT partnership agreement, feedback loop design, measurement framework.

Post-launch: regular performance reviews, continuous training updates, optimization based on usage patterns, support response tracking.

Most ai vendor evaluation checklists focus on features and pricing. The successful ones focus on readiness and support.

Mid-size companies don’t have room for failed AI experiments. Get the checklist right before you start. Evaluate support quality as carefully as technical capabilities. Prepare your team and infrastructure before launch day.

The vendors selling you AI want to talk about their latest features. What you actually need is a partner who’ll help you succeed with AI you bought last year.

About the Author

Amit Kothari is an experienced consultant, advisor, and educator specializing in AI and operations. With 25+ years of experience and as the founder of Tallyfy (raised $3.6m), he helps mid-size companies identify, plan, and implement practical AI solutions that actually work. Originally British and now based in St. Louis, MO, Amit combines deep technical expertise with real-world business understanding.

Disclaimer: The content in this article represents personal opinions based on extensive research and practical experience. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy through data analysis and source verification, this should not be considered professional advice. Always consult with qualified professionals for decisions specific to your situation.